Opinion: Can Utah help solve the supply chain crisis?

The controversial but needed Utah Inland Port can enhance manufacturing in Utah and other Western states, promising to handle exports and imports more efficiently

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The nation is dealing with some big problems. Here’s a look at a couple of them and how Utah might contribute to their solutions. Also, we’re political hacks, but we also notice sports.

The nation faces a serious supply chain problem just as the holiday shopping season starts. Can Utah provide some help to solve this and other economic problems?

Pignanelli: “On Twitter, the supply chain has been blamed for: getting nothing done, disappointed children, an excess of camouflage pajama pants, hungry dogs, insomnia, bare grocery store shelves … and dating advice.”— Aurora Almendral, Quartz

Teenagers are known for sleeping late until a parent screams a wake-up demand because a school or work obligation is being blissfully ignored. Similarly, throughout history our nation has slumbered until an economic, military or technology catastrophe awakened us. Today we are amid a five-alarm signal snapping us to attention.

Free trade fosters the exchange of products and services among nations — increasing economic opportunities across the planet. But the pandemic revealed a complacency in manufacturing, shipping and protecting intellectual property. Interchange with nations collapsed because the current system is vulnerable to shocks.

Fortunately, this crisis is providing opportunities for Utah to take advantage as the “crossroads of the West.” The rural economic development incentive program initiated under prior administrations and supercharged by Gov. Spencer Cox is promoting manufacturing in efficient and ecological methods. This is a critical formula, that if replicated elsewhere, can give Americans local access to needed goods and avoid unfriendly leverage from other nations.

The controversial but needed Utah Inland Port can enhance manufacturing in Utah and other Western states, promising to handle exports and imports more efficiently. Because Utah is facing a clean air dilemma, the port will encourage environmentally sensitive operations.

The U.S. will eventually overcome this crisis by following Utah’s lead. Unlike the atypical teenager, our state was already awake and moving when the alarm sounded.

Webb: The Utah Legislature, working with the Salt Lake Chamber, was visionary in creating the Utah Inland Port system. It really can help ease California port delays and get more diesel truck off the highways, improving air quality, by better using the rail system to get goods to and from Utah.

With a state-of-the-art transloading facility using clean energy, Utah can make a difference in our nation’s supply chain logistics. The result will be more local manufacturing and warehousing, using clean energy and more good jobs. The benefits won’t be produced immediately, but long-term planning, taking advantage is Utah’s natural strengths, is vital for a continued strong economy.

A shortage of eager workers continues to hamper small and large businesses. This problem highlights a dysfunctional immigration system that divides the nation and leaves illegal immigrants in limbo. How can Utah help?

Pignanelli: The American economy is desperately trying to rebound while inhibited by limited employment. We were in this situation before, and the solution has not changed — hard-working immigrants. Utah has a ready commonsense approach — the Utah Compact. Although developed several years ago, it remains a guidance for national lawmakers.

Webb: My wife and I are building a house right now. It has been a challenge for our contractors to find enough skilled workers. Most of those working on the home have been Hispanic, some not speaking English very well. They are terrific, hard-working tradesmen, expert in carpentry, masonry, roofing, siding installation, Sheetrocking, etc. They work long hours and earn good money. I expect many of their next generation will be college graduates. We need more of them.

Immigration is a quintessential federal responsibility. Congress has been criminally negligent for years in not creating a modern, efficient immigration system that secures our borders, keeps bad people out, while providing a reasonably straightforward opportunity for many good people to immigrate to our country and help build America. Almost all of us descend from such immigrants. The Utah Compact shows the way.

On the bright side, it’s fun to be a Utahn right now. 2021 has been an amazing year for women’s and men’s sports teams in Utah. What has contributed to all this success on the football, basketball, soccer and volleyball arenas?

Pignanelli: Utah is a cool place that attracts young athletes from across the planet … and within our state. Our universities and colleges strive to follow the “Utah Way,” offering opportunities and lifestyles that promote excellence in education, athletic competition and ethical conduct.

Webb: It’s really all about great leadership. Excellent organizations, whether in sports, politics or business, require great leaders. Leaders make all the difference. Utah is blessed with some terrific athletic directors, coaches, team owners and university administrators.

Athletic superiority, like excellence in business, politics, nonprofits and government, doesn’t happen by happenstance. It’s not luck. The competition is daunting. Getting to the top, and staying there, requires incessant focus, hard work, learning from failure, intense attention to detail, quick action at times, wisdom and first-class character traits. Congrats to all the Utah sports teams, and all who associate with them, who exemplify excellence.

Can a Democrat ever win a statewide race in Utah again?

The party has not won a statewide race since 1996. Legislative seats have remained relatively constant, averaging less than 25% in each house

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The political class loves to analyze and dissect trends and nuances affecting voters. We perform our own dissection of a recent survey conducted by the respected think tank Utah Foundation regarding political ideology of Utah voters.

Using methodology employed by the Pew Foundation on a cross-section of American voters, the Utah Foundation retained Y2 Analytics to measure the political ideology of Utahns. To no one’s surprise, a great deal of polarization exists between members of the two main political parties. However, while Utah Republicans remained stable on the political spectrum, Utah Democrats have recently moved farther to the left than even their counterparts in the rest of the country. Do election results reflect this trend and what does it portend for the future?

Pignanelli: “Progressives brag publicly about pushing the Democratic party leftward — and they succeeded.” – Kevin Drum, Jabberwocking

For decades the common adage was a Utah Democrat would be considered a Republican anywhere else. This once perceptive insight morphed into a mistaken canard. Veteran observers illustrate the leftward shift in the last two decades by reference to election results. A Democrat has not won a statewide race since 1996. Legislative seats have remained relatively constant, averaging less than 25% in each house.

The liberal swing increases difficulty for moderate Democrats in convention and primary contests. Furthermore, candidates will be tempted to appease well-funded national PACs that demand adherence to lefty litmus tests that create problems in the general election.

Unless a new maxim is adopted and practiced, the minority party may have difficulty garnering additional victories.

Webb: Democrats in Utah and nationally are in very difficult positions right now, poised to lose seats in the 2022 election. It is a predicament of their own making. By tilting left on so many issues, they have left ordinary citizens behind. They misunderstand the attitudes of average, commonsense Americans who don’t favor big government, high taxes or over-the-top political correctness.

The problem is both ideology and issues. Americans don’t believe they are systemically racist and they recoil against the liberal ideology of victimhood and identity politics. They are concerned about the loss of traditional values and are suspicious of big government, Big Tech, big media, big business,and the entertainment industry that together seem to control the levers of power.

And they see the problems of inflation (especially gas prices), energy dependence on foreign countries, dysfunctional immigration, crime and an ineffective COVID-19 response getting worse under the Biden administration and Democratic control of Congress.

When I talk to ordinary people, working men and women, they are appalled. They simply feel the country is going in the wrong direction. They are ready for a change.

The survey also indicated that 50% of Utah voters are registered as Republicans and just 15% as Democrats, reflecting a slight increase since 2016. Is it hopeless for Democrats or is there a path where they could attract unaffiliated and moderate Republicans?

Pignanelli: The study reaffirms Democrats can only win key races (federal, statewide and swing legislative) if they cobble together a coalition of usual supporters, a majority unaffiliated and a slice of moderate Republicans.

Congressman Jim Matheson was the most successful Utah Democrat in this century by establishing his persona as a maverick not beholden to Washington liberals. (Ben McAdams used a similar tactic in 2018.) For example, both promised they would not vote for Nancy Pelosi as speaker of the House, which was well accepted. Their tactics demonstrate an important element that Utahns will elect a Democrat with demonstrable distance from the left wing.

Major issues Democrats historically forwarded (i.e. clean air, economic fairness, nondiscrimination, etc.) are now important to many local Republicans — especially millennials. Messaging on these issues, while demonstrating separation from the national Democratic agenda, could be a fertile approach. The “Matheson Formula” for success exists. Is there a willingness to use it?

Webb: The Democratic registration number is low, in part, because, unlike Republicans, the party does not require registration to participate in party caucuses or primary elections. Thus, a number of Utahns consider themselves to be Democrats but aren’t counted in the registration numbers.

Still, while quality Democratic candidates can still win some legislative races and nonpartisan local government contests, it will take a very special mainstream, charismatic Democrat to win a statewide office or a seat in Congress.

Both Pew and Utah Foundation suggest that national and Utah voters (including unaffiliated) as a whole slightly shifted left. What does this imply for our state?

Pignanelli: This reveals that Utah Republican leaders are very shrewd. They are appeasing the extreme elements within ranks while quietly responding to concerns their constituents are expressing on social, education and environmental issues. By doing so they have maintained power without sacrificing traditional principles.

Webb: I’m not surprised to see a slight shift given the pervasive liberal messaging of the mainstream news media, academia, Hollywood/entertainment industry and the technology giants. With the nation’s major influencers all far to the left, it’s actually more surprising that more citizens haven’t followed their lead. It’s a tribute to individual independence that so many average Americans are still conservative and don’t want big government to dictate their lives and take care of them from cradle to grave.

What Utah politicians are thankful for this year

We are especially grateful that Utah’s politicians can’t help but be interesting creatures who generate ample news and controversy to keep us busy every week

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Pignanelli & Webb: Our politicians have much to be grateful for this Thanksgiving weekend (especially the patience of citizens). Using drones with cameras and listening devices that also scour social media (perfected by Evan McMullin when he was in the CIA), we were able to upload secret intelligence regarding the expressions of gratitude by political and community leaders.

Utah legislators: They express gratitude that there were many controversial issues in the recent special session, like mandatory workforce vaccinations, changing a university name and others, so the redistricting issue was partially smothered.

Gov. Spencer Cox: He expresses appreciation for the hard work and dedication of legislators in the recent special session. He is especially grateful for their efficient deliberations so that they could adjourn in time for him to conduct his fundraising gala without breaking any contribution laws.

Left-wing and right-wing activists: They are grateful for the many opportunities the Legislature gave them throughout the year to participate in hearings and discussions on numerous issues. They enjoyed the platform to complain about how the Legislature is not including them in anything. They are also thankful being disingenuous is not against the law.

Reps. Blake Moore, Chris Stewart, John Curtis and Burgess Owens: They compliment the Legislature for its careful, thoughtful and fair deliberations in crafting new boundaries while balancing the many competing interests. In other words, … THANK YOU for those BEAUTIFUL, SWEET districts!

Moderate Democrats: They certainly appreciate the recent election results in Virginia and New Jersey that clearly demonstrate that extreme left-leaning and progressive objectives are unpopular and mainstream approaches are needed for them to succeed in 2022.

Moderate Republicans: They certainly appreciate the recent election results in Virginia and New Jersey that demonstrate that extreme right-leaning objectives and kowtowing to former President Donald Trump are not popular, and mainstream approaches are needed for them to succeed in 2022.

Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson: As Utah’s election czar, she is so grateful that the recent municipal elections went off without a hitch, including ranked choice voting. She certainly did not need any more unfounded allegations of election fraud.

Utah politicians: They are glad that Utah, BYU and Utah State all have winning football records. It makes their constituents happy. And when they’re happy, they like politicians.

Attorney General Sean Reyes: He appreciates the big technology companies and the Biden administration. They make such good targets for multistate lawsuits and wonderful publicity.

Senate President Stuart Adams and House Speaker Brad Wilson: They are grateful that the only people who get upset about redistricting are liberal activist groups, Democrats and the news media. But they are usually unhappy with legislative leaders, anyway. They’re also thankful that they won’t be involved 10 years from now.

Republicans: Even though he won’t be on the ballot, they are grateful that Biden will be a major issue in 2022.

Democrats. Even though he won’t be on the ballot, they are grateful that Trump will be a major issue in 2022.

Aspiring young Republican legislators: They wish retired Majority Leader Francis Gibson well and are grateful that his departure creates a vacancy on the leadership ladder, providing more opportunities for them.

Salt Lake County Mayor Jenny Wilson: As the highest-ranking Democrat in Utah, she’s always glad that all the other officials have to come to her for access to the Biden administration.

Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall: Although everyone loves to complain about the capital city, no one denies that it’s become very cool in reputation nationally and globally. Thanks for that.

U.S. Sen. Mike Lee: He is grateful for the open democratic process developed by our Founding Fathers. This allows his potential opponents to all compete for the same slice of voters. The more the merrier!

U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney: He is appreciative of President Joe Biden. His tilt to the progressive left-wing gives Romney plenty of ammunition to attack him and thereby mend fences with conservatives.

Utah technology leaders: They love to complain about liquor laws and air quality. In reality, this state has fostered and promoted their growth. So, they begrudgingly thank Utah for that.

Lobbyists: What a great country. Where else is there complex legislation with thousands of pages packed with goodies and problems that no one has read or understands — compelling clients to hire them? In addition, there are billions of dollars just begging for their advice on how it should be spent. It is truly a cornucopia of blessings.

Rational Americans: They are thankful the record-breaking voter turnout in Virginia and New Jersey demonstrates that citizens are ignoring the baseless claims of election fraud made by right- and left-wing extremists.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: She is thankful for the lemmings out there willing to follow her off the 2022 election cliff with proposals for bigger government, higher taxes and more regulation.

Pignanelli and Webb: As always, we are hugely grateful that the Deseret News allows us to blather and pontificate every week. But we are especially thankful that Utah’s politicians can’t help but be interesting creatures who generate ample news and controversy to keep us busy every week.

What is the long-term fallout of the Legislature’s recent session?

They changed the name of Dixie State University and redrew political maps — two things steeped in controversy and passionate feelings

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The Legislature’s recent special session produced substantive results — and emotions — on critical issues for Utah. We review how those two days of legislating will impact Utah politics over the long term.

The special session was originally convened to finalize new boundaries for congressional, legislative and state school board districts. But a number of other items consumed lawmakers’ attention, including changing the name of Dixie State University, bail reform, modifying the status of the Intermountain Power Agency and providing exemptions to employees from the federal vaccination mandate. Overall, was the Legislature successful in balancing competing interests or will there be negative fallout?

Pignanelli: “What the Legislature giveth the Legislature can taketh”—Rep. Joel Ferry, R-Brigham City.

As an engaged observer of the legislative process (aka lobbyist), I have the advantage of a holistic view. This is in comparison to good citizens focused on a particular matter. For example, many concerned with redistricting or vaccination exemptions felt the Legislature succeeded or failed because of specific actions. But a comprehensive examination reveals this special session was one of “equilibrium.”

The new boundaries for congressional districts were subject to controversy and partisan attacks. Yet, the new legislative and school board districts received bipartisan support with little commentary. Many southern Utah residents were frustrated with the university name change, while most rural citizens applauded the revamp of Intermountain Power Agency.

Numerous local employers demanded vaccination exemptions to retain employees, but others were nervous with the concept. Lawmakers excluded any employer with a federal contract — a substantial number. Other employees were understandably frustrated having to choose between state or federal law compliance, but the courts may make that moot. The bail reform legislation was the picture of political equanimity as all stakeholders made concessions to achieve a consensus bill. Citizens frustrated with congressional redistricting supported the university name change.

Equilibrium occurs when opposing forces are balanced. A semblance of harmony pervaded the recent special session because there were results for most citizens to contemporarily like and dislike.

Webb: Democrats and liberal activist groups hate the congressional redistricting. But I think moderate, commonsense Democrats (like Ben McAdams) still have a shot at winning. It will depend on the quality of candidates.

And the districts will change. With the rapid growth of high-tech businesses in northern Utah County and southern Salt Lake County, that region is changing politically and growing a bluish tint. Young, hip tech workers tend to be more liberal, more focused on environmental issues and civil rights, offering Democrats a chance.

As I’ve written previously, I fully support the Dixie State name change. It will be good for the university. I understand the opposition and the nostalgia for the old name. I loved my time at Dixie College in the early 1970s. Perhaps I was naïve, but I honestly didn’t even think about the racial connotations of the name. I also don’t recall any racist occurrences, like students wearing blackface or groups holding “slave auctions.” But those things certainly did occur and, whether it was intentionally racist or not, it was wrong.

The name change is needed. Society has dramatically changed since the 1970s. And we have vastly improved with regard to racial sensitivity. The old name wasn’t meant to be racist, but it doesn’t work for students graduating and seeking employment nearly 50 years after I did. We evolve, we get better, we need to acknowledge past mistakes. Lawmakers did the right thing.

What long-term political consequences will result from the special session?

Pignanelli: Since the adoption of our beloved Constitution, allegations of “gerrymandering” have rarely, if ever, mattered in a subsequent election. So, threats of retaliation are hollow. Many businesses are grateful the Legislature provided them a safe harbor in dealing with unvaccinated employees. However, if the U.S. Supreme Court upholds the Biden administration, there will be employers frustrated they were forced into a difficult position. Coupled with other contingencies (i.e. the pandemic, inflation), this could affect support of candidates.

Webb: Let’s not forget that Utah is a Republican state, led mostly by mainstream, sensible leaders. We enjoy a terrific economy and excellent quality of life. Utah had four GOP members of Congress before the session and after the next election it is likely to be status quo. Utah’s Legislature balances budgets while taking care of state needs. Problems are addressed and solved. Citizens are pleased with the direction of the state, while disgusted with federal dysfunction. Politics isn’t going to change much.

Any benefits or setbacks for Gov. Spencer Cox?

Pignanelli: Legislators absorbed most of the attention and heat leading to and during the special session. No bill violated principles articulated by Cox during the campaign or his inauguration. He shrewdly, and quietly, signed them into law. The advantage is that he will receive some credit from others and only a smattering of blame.

Webb: The governor did just fine in the session. It made no sense for him to veto the redistricting legislation or other measures passed. The governor actually gets along pretty well with the Legislature, despite the normal tension and different perspectives. He’s smart enough to know when to be visibly out in front, in the driver’s seat, and when to negotiate behind the scenes and let other leaders be the focus of attention.

How will Eastern election results affect Utah?

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Much analysis has focused on how Virginia/New Jersey gubernatorial elections sent a signal that Democrats are in trouble. But what about the impact on Utah’s elections?

National pundits have waxed eloquently on the earthshaking political events of early November: The Virginia/New Jersey elections, vaccination mandate, infrastructure legislation, climate summit, etc. We have been suffering a serious case of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out), so to relieve our symptoms we opine on how these issues will impact Utah politics. In other words, we get in on the fun.

Much analysis has focused on how Virginia/New Jersey gubernatorial elections sent a signal that Democrats are in trouble. Their control of the House and Senate may be at risk in the 2022 elections. But what about the impact on Utah’s elections?

Pignanelli: “Democrats are coming across in ways that are annoying, offensive and seem out of touch.” — Van Jones, liberal commentator, CNN

Frequently, American elections reflect the famous Greek tragedies written millennia ago — filled with flawed characters, hubris and catastrophic events. Thus, this November’s outcome will be a long-remembered classic.

The ripple effect in Utah will be subtle but real. National Democratic organizations will conserve resources to protect incumbents, limiting funds for local challengers. This extends to coordinated efforts between congressional and legislative campaigns. In addition, unless the trajectory changes, a predicted GOP wave will influence down-ballot races in numerous positions.

Republican candidates that were moderate in tone and established distance from the former president performed well, especially in demographics won by Joe Biden in 2020. This experience could flavor inter-party battles in Utah at the convention and primary levels.

Innocent Utah politicos will be positively or negatively impacted by faraway events fostered by arrogance and cluelessness. Ancient lessons in Greek plays still resonate in modern Americana.

Webb: It wasn’t just Virginia and a much-better-than-expected GOP showing in New Jersey that should worry Democrats. They lost numerous local races all across the country. Democrats have been trying to push America far left, but we are simply not a left-wing nation.

The razor-thin Democratic win in the 2020 election was a rebellion in the suburbs against Donald Trump. It wasn’t an endorsement of big government, high taxes, left-leaning ideology and racial and identity politics. Americans are fed up with victimhood and over-the-top political correctness.

Even more discouraging for Democrats, Republicans learned how to win races, and put together coalitions, despite former President Trump hovering over the political landscape. Glenn Youngkin was brilliant in Virginia in supporting Trump and his policies, while also keeping him at arms length.

Walking this tightrope required Trump himself to exercise some restraint and not help Democrats turn the race into a referendum on him. When President Joe Biden campaigned for Terry McAuliffe, he mentioned Trump 24 times. Democrats desperately tried to make the campaign about Trump but failed, because Youngkin was able to maintain some distance. But Youngkin didn’t have to disavow Trump and managed to turn out the Trump base.

That’s a lesson for Sen. Mitt Romney, although it’s probably too late. Rather than ignore Trump, Romney has trashed him at every opportunity. As a result, Romney probably faces a tough battle for the GOP nomination.

Lawsuits have been filed by states and businesses to prevent implementation of mandatory vaccinations as ordered by Biden. Legislatures, including Utah, are attempting to prevent mandate enforcement in Utah. Could this be an election issue for 2022?

Pignanelli: State officials are reflecting constituents’ frustrations with overreaching government by creating obstacles to federal implementation. Many employers believe compliance with OSHA will create employment vacuums. However, other businesses are frustrated with being forced to choose to violate state or federal law. Emotions on either side will drive voting patterns, campaign contributions and internal party contests. A sour economy and a lingering pandemic guarantee mandatory vaccinations will creep into the 2022 elections.

Webb: My wife and I are both vaccinated and have even received our booster shots. We encourage everyone eligible to become fully vaccinated. But I don’t believe the president has the authority to order businesses with 100 or more employees to fire everyone who refuses to get vaccinated. It’s a typical big-government coercive approach to force compliance and it’s going to hurt Biden and Democrats in the long run. It gives a rabble-rouser like Trump an issue to run on.

The $1.2 trillion infrastructure package was finally passed by Congress. How will this bill impact political deliberations, especially since Sen. Romney was the only member of Utah’s delegation to vote for it?

Pignanelli: Utah will garner $3 billion or more from this legislation. The contemplated projects promise to touch every Utahn whether through transportation, broadband expansion, water resources, etc. Should Romney run for reelection in 2024, he can take credit for the assistance to the state. In the meantime, the acrimony over the multitrillion “social infrastructure” (“Build Back Better)” bill could blemish any federal stimulus and capital improvements. The lousy messaging and funding concerns deliver superior talking points to GOP candidates. Democrats will spend time explaining … which is never helpful.

Webb: Utah can use the money and will spend it wisely. But there’s a lot of waste in the legislation, and a lot more debt. It’s not paid for, as proponents claim. Utah should use the windfall for one-time projects and not build it into long-term budgets because when it’s gone it’s gone.

Utah politics awash in resignations, intrigue

The last several days have produced a zesty potpourri of political news. Here’s what it all means

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Pignanelli & Webb: The last several days have produced a zesty potpourri of political news, especially changes in political leadership. Here are people, issues and events spicing up Utah’s political world.

Francis Gibson. “A resignation is a grave act; never performed by a right-minded man without forethought or with reserve.” — Salmon P. Chase

The House majority leader announced he would not only retire from the Legislature but resign, effective Nov. 8. That produced a big shock reverberating through insider circles. Gibson was often viewed as the likely next speaker, although rumors circulated that Gibson’s often-brusque style could jeopardize such advancement.

Gibson’s resignation shakes up House GOP leadership. Popular Whip Mike Schultz is likely to replace him. Assistant Whip Val Peterson announced he will continue in his current position. So, the whip race is wide open. Gibson was a very able, talented lawmaker who didn’t tolerate much rebellion against leadership positions. His vacancy will have ripple effects in House culture and leadership style.

Steve Christiansen. This West Jordan lawmaker made national news organizing a rally and conducting a hearing demanding an audit of Utah’s 2020 elections. Legislators allowed his supporters ample time to state their case, but no commitments towards legislation were made. Backlash from across the political spectrum was strong and clear. Christiansen not only resigned his seat at the Legislature, citing threats against his family, but also his employment at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

This action by Christiansen sends a clear message that Utah’s political and business establishment is not interested in re-litigating the 2020 elections in Utah, especially with no proof of any fraud.

Redistricting Commission. Established by a 2018 ballot initiative, this independent entity developed maps for federal and state districts after months of deliberation and public input. They formally presented the maps to the Legislature last Monday. Within a few seconds, GOP officials noted the proposed congressional maps would provide an advantage for Democrats in one of the four districts.

The reality is that the Republican Legislature was never going to allow the Redistricting Commission to dictate district boundaries. This is further amplified by the fact that the GOP is just a few seats short of majority in the U.S. House, and they are not going to give a free one to a Democrat. The media and some left-of-center activist groups will complain about the Nov. 9 special session vote that ignores the commission recommendations, but it will be forgotten by the end of the year.

Rob Bishop. The former congressman was an interesting selection for the Redistricting Commission. His very public resignation from the group in October did not change the commission’s recommendations. But Bishop’s arguments and his resignation did provide cover for lawmakers who will likely stipulate that the proportions of rural and urban/suburban population in each of the four congressional districts should be as close to the same as possible.

John Curtis. This moderately conservative congressman from Utah’s 4th District attended the COP26 Climate Summit to discuss solutions to global warming. Curtis organized the Conservative Climate Caucus and has acknowledged that on climate and environmental issues, Republicans have a “branding problem.” He asserts that Republicans care about the environment and climate change, and the GOP should be at the table when environmental and economic commitments are made.

This reflects a growing dynamic in Utah. Residents of all political stripes are concerned about clean air and the changing local climate. Curtis, however, will have difficulty changing public perception of GOP views on environmental issues. But if gas prices continue to rise and the emerging global energy crisis worsens, public opinion on energy and climate may align more with Republican views than with the climate activists.

Public education curriculum. The Virginia gubernatorial election highlighted the potency of education as a political issue and the sensitivity of race and cultural issues in school curriculum. It also confirmed the importance of parents having a role to play in their children’s education.

This dustup is noteworthy as Utah also is engaged in serious discussions over public education curriculum. We think most Utah school boards and teachers strike the right balance and teach these topics respectfully and properly. School leaders also welcome parental involvement. Still, Utah lawmakers are likely to weigh in on these matters in the upcoming legislative session.

President Joseph Biden. The president’s approval ratings continue to drop amid worsening crises. These include perceptions of his handling of the economy, Afghanistan withdrawal, COVID-19, inflation, the border/immigration crisis, and his priority legislation.

Most Utahns did not vote for the president and do not support his agenda. His continued decline in popularity places Utah Democratic candidates in swing districts in political jeopardy, and especially hurts any chance of Democrats winning a congressional race. It’s fair to say Utahns appreciate the president’s demeanor and politeness, compared to Donald Trump, but that alone won’t help Democrats.

GOP National Convention. October also witnessed a real attempt by local operatives to land the 2024 Presidential Nominating Convention in Salt Lake City. The new convention hotel at the Salt Palace will help that cause, but it’s probably a long shot.

Opinion: How should Utah’s political leaders dress for Halloween?

From Ted Lasso to Scooby Doo, political leaders echo the characteristics of several fictional characters in real life.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

For the past several weeks, Utahns have been frightened by apparitions and haunting illusions — mostly emanating from Washington, D.C. But it’s also Halloween this weekend. Our politicians love free goodies even more than the rest of us. We utilized various artificial intelligence algorithms to determine what costumes they will be wearing as they seek treats and threaten tricks.

Gov. Spencer Cox will be dressed as Ted Lasso the football coach turned soccer manager. (For those of you who don’t have Apple TV, this award-winning fictional character is beloved by viewers for his incredible ability to be always positive and upbeat and for transforming enemies into friends.)

Lt. Gov. Diedre Henderson will be Wonder Woman as she uses her magic lasso to corral those pesky individuals claiming voting irregularities.

The Independent Redistricting Commission members (those left of center) will be dressed as the Bad News Bears dysfunctional baseball team trying to capture attention while irritating incumbent lawmakers.

The other redistricting commission members (those right of center) will be dressed as farmers and cowboys, emphasizing that each congressional district must include a large rural component.

Rep. Steve Christiansen and his fellow claimants of election fraud will be dressed as Scooby Doo and the Mystery Inc. gang, having fun looking for any evidence, any whatsoever, of voting scams in Utah.

Legislative redistricting chairs Sen. Scott Sandall and Rep. Paul Ray will wear railroad engineer caps, signifying that the redistricting locomotive is barreling down the track and you’d better get on board or get run over.

Congressmen Chris Stewart and Blake Moore will be each wearing military uniforms to help convince the redistricting committee that both should have a portion of Hill Air Force Base in their new districts.

President Joe Biden will be Casper the friendly ghost because he’s nice. Utahns don’t like his policies, but he has a nice smile.

Former President Donald Trump will be wearing the hockey mask of Michael Myers, the villain in many “Halloween” movies, hoping to terrorize liberals in an upcoming sequel.

Sen. Mike Lee will be costumed as the Norse god Thor, so he can use the big hammer to squash liberals, big technology companies and those not respectful of the Constitution.

Independent U.S. Senate candidate Evan McMullin will be dressed as Don Quixote (no further explanation necessary).

The announced major party candidates opposing Sen. Lee (Becky Edwards, Ally Isom, Nick Mitchell, Austin Searle, Allen Glines) will be dressed as the 1969 Miracle Mets with the hope that wondrous phenomena do actually occur.

Attorney General Sean Reyes will be dressing as Teddy Roosevelt the “trust buster,” reflecting his attempts to bust up Big Tech.

Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall will don the mask of diplomat Henry Kissinger, representing her ability to keep left-wing City Council members and constituents happy, while balancing the scrutiny of conservative legislators.

Congressman Burgess Owens will be wearing a suit made of Teflon. Apparently, attacks upon him — or even comments made by him — bounce off without causing harm.

Sen. Mitt Romney will return as the Dark Knight — mysterious in his ways but trying to instill common sense into the dark corridors of the nation’s Capitol.

Salt Lake County Mayor Jenny Wilson will again assume the nun habit of Mother Teresa, demonstrating her concern for those afflicted in the pandemic while hoping to shame state leaders.

Congressman John Curtis is superhero Plastic Man, able to stretch himself across the state and the political aisles in preventing global warming and protecting states’ rights in public lands.

House Speaker Brad Wilson will sport the attire of Atlas, the demigod, shouldering the multitude of appropriation requests from those seeking a piece of the federal generosity.

Senate President Stuart Adams will seek treats as Gandalf the Grey, effortlessly and effectively leading his fellowship of senators through the scary forest filled with protestors, lobbyists and House members.

Senate Minority Leader Karen Mayne is Flo, the Progressive Insurance spokeswoman, reminding everyone that a unique style of relentless determination and earnestness does succeed.

Minority Leader Brian King is the cartoon character Underdog, fighting for right of the opposition to oppose anything, at any time, no matter what.

State Auditor John Dougall returns again as Baby Yoda, rooting out mediocre performance in state government.

Former Sen. Orrin Hatch is the Great Pumpkin. We know he is out there and we have fond memories but there haven’t been any sightings and we wish him well.

Pignanelli & Webb will be dressing again as a couple of gone-to-seed potted plants, reflecting both their intelligence and personalities.

Enjoy watching legislative sausage-making? Pull up a chair

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The American ritual of redrawing congressional and legislature boundaries is well underway across the country and in Utah. News reports about the process are filled with acrimony and intrigue. We explore the considerations important to Utah politics.

What are some of the primary issues that lawmakers, interested observers and the independent redistricting commission will encounter as they prepare for a final plan to be adopted in a November special session?

Pignanelli: “The Illinois (redistricting plan) demonstrates that no party has a lock on political virtue.”— Henry Olsen, Washington Post

Thirty-one years ago my wife and I were looking for a home with the hope to someday raise children. She cared about a garage and yard. As a legislator, other concerns burdened me. Having just completed another bruising reelection effort, I demanded this new residence be located in the middle of my legislative district to prevent imaginative political operatives from eliminating my seat during the upcoming redistricting. I was obligated to protect the investment of friends and supporters, along with constituents, who elected me.

These legitimate and reasonable concerns were shared by my legislative colleagues. Often labeled “incumbency protection,” similar convictions have existed for centuries and will into the future. Admittedly, these emotions frequently collide with other elements, including population balancing, communities of interest, municipal boundaries, expanding representation in high growth areas, minority interests, etc.

Targeting incumbents with extreme boundary adjustments (aka “getting cute”) often backfires in Utah. For example, attempts to eliminate state Sen. Scott Howell and Congressman Jim Matheson through creative redistricting bolstered their reelection campaigns and political careers.

My wife and I are now empty nesters in that well-placed Capitol Hill historic home where we raised three incredible children. Another benefit to incumbency protection.

Webb: Redistricting is legislative sausage-making at its finest. If you like pure politics, pull up a chair. In congressional redistricting, Democrats will want to create a safe Democratic district, reasoning that the usual Democratic vote is higher than 25% statewide, so Democrats deserve at least 25% representation in Congress. Of course, carving out a safe Democratic district would be the definition of partisan gerrymandering — something everyone is supposed to be against. Given the reality that control of Congress may hang in the balance, Republicans aren’t likely to fulfill the Democrats’ deepest desires.

Beyond that, debate will occur over whether each congressional district should be comprised of urban, suburban and rural components. Doing so gives each member of Congress a stake in Utah’s sparsely populated wide open spaces and a concern for public lands.

In creating both congressional and legislative districts, a major driver will be the large population shifts that have occurred over the past decade. The fastest growth has occurred in Republican-dominated areas, which naturally means those regions will get more representation.

For the first time, Utah has a formal independent redistricting commission that will provide recommendations to the Legislature. Will it have an impact on the process?

Pignanelli: The redistricting commission was formally created by initiative in 2018. Therefore, it will capture media attention when presenting final proposals.

However, Senate President Stuart Adams and House Speaker Brad Wilson are brilliantly promoting alternative means of public participation other than the commission. Lawmakers conducted a series of town halls and aggressively encouraged citizens to access the “Utah Redistricting Legislative Committee” website to develop their own maps. They inspired constituents to be engaged personally in the process. Thus, an alternate source of public opinion other than the commission is developing.

Redistricting results always garner critics and opponents. But the legislative tactics will deflect attacks on the process.

Webb: In many states, independent commissions are bogged down in partisan bickering and anger. By contrast, Utah’s commission members seem to be getting along just fine — at least so far. Liberal interest groups are already demanding that the Legislature simply adopt the recommendations of the redistricting commission, despite not yet knowing what the commission will recommend. They assume the commission boundaries will be better for Democrats than the lines drawn by the Legislative Redistricting Committee. When interest groups say they want “fair and impartial” boundaries it really means they want boundaries drawn that fit their political interests.

Both the legislative committee and the independent commission will do their best to keep cities, counties and “communities of interest” together. While that is important, I guarantee it won’t be possible in every case. To achieve districts of equal population (which is required), some cities and counties will be divided and it won’t be possible to keep all communities of interest intact. Some communities will suffer a bit. To be fair, the pain should be equally split among Republican and Democratic areas.

In some states, the governor has vetoed redistricting legislation or demanded changes. What role will Gov. Spencer Cox play?

Pignanelli: A former lawmaker, Cox understands the constitutional role lawmakers play in drawing boundaries. While offering guidance behind the scenes, he is unlikely to publicly counter final results from the special session.

Webb: The state constitution gives the Legislature the duty to redistrict the state. Short of some egregious offense or power play, I doubt the governor will second-guess legislative action.