A guess at what Utah politicians had on their summer reading lists

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

Happy Labor Day! This is the unofficial end of a very hot, tough, exhausting political summer. But Utah politicos did have an opportunity or two to kick back and read a book on vacation or peruse hobby information on the internet. Through diligent research, both scrupulous and unscrupulous, we uncovered the summer reading material of politicos and leaders, or what they were checking out online (Alexa got a workout!).

Utah state epidemiologist Angela Dunn: “The Public Health Physician’s Guide to Patience: Dealing With Politicians, Media and Anti-Mask Extremists While Explaining What is Best for Them.”

Gov. Gary Herbert: “Fundraising as an Art Form: How to Solicit Donors When You Have Only Months Left in Your Term.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “Newt Gingrich’s Guide on How to Fail Spectacularly at Making Impeachment Proceedings a Key Issue in the Next Election.”

Pres. Donald Trump: “Nixon’s 1968 Election Tactics: How to Use Riots, Racial Tension and Fear of the Left Wing to Energize the Silent Majority and Build a Winning Majority.”

Congressman Rob Bishop: “Alexa, is this the definition of hell: No baseball, shortages of Diet Dr Pepper and Democrats leading in the polls?”

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden: “American Presidential Campaigns in the 19th Century: Campaigning From the Porch.”

Republican gubernatorial candidate and Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox: “The Candidate’s Complete Guide to Deflecting and Preventing Write-In Opponents.”

U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney: “The Ex-Wives’, Prior Business Partners’, Former Employees’ and Disavowed Family Members’ Complete Guide to Antagonizing Donald Trump on a Regular Basis.”

Most politicians and citizens living outside the capital city: “Alexa, what is it with those Salt Lake City people’s pandemic response? Are they from another planet?”

Salt Lake City politicians and residents: “Alexa, why are we the only enlightened humans in the state?”

Democrat gubernatorial nominee Chris Peterson: “Setting Yourself Up for Life: How to Use Campaign Experience to Write Legal Journal Articles and Law School Courses for Decades.”

U.S. Sen. Mike Lee: Google search: “How to practice zen-like peacefulness and patience while waiting for the shot to the Supreme Court.”

Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall: “How to Reveal the Artistry and Philosophy of Protests in a Red State.”

Salt Lake County Attorney Sim Gill: Google search: “How to walk the tightrope as a Democrat elected as a prosecutor, especially in these times.”

Congressman Ben McAdams: Google search: “How to defeat unexpected stiff opposition with tones of moderation and niceness.”

4th District Republican Congressional Candidate Burgess Owens: “The Football Safety Position: Excellent Preparation for a Congressional Candidate.”

Utah Democrat Party Chair Jeff Merchant: “The Proud History of Defining Victory in Impossible Situations.”

Austin Cox (campaign manager for Spencer Cox): Google search: “Tools to convince older political hacks that a 20-something can run a successful statewide campaign.”

Natalie Gochnour, director of the Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah: “Achieving the Impossible: How to Develop a Multifaceted, Comprehensive Economic Recovery Plan in the Midst of a Pandemic.”

Utah Republican Party Chair Derek Brown: “The True Test of Political Leadership: Repairing the Wounds After Three Different Four-Way Primary Battles.”

First District congressional candidate Blake Moore: “Foreign Service Experience: Unique Preparation for Dealing With the Strange Creatures Inhabiting the Nation’s Capital.”

Democratic congressional candidates Darren Parry and Devin Thorpe: Google search: “How to stand out without money or media.”

Congressman John Curtis: Google search: “How to protect the environment and address climate change while representing a very conservative congressional district.”

Republican lieutenant governor running mate Deidre Henderson: Google search: “Tips for running a campaign while recovering from COVID-19 and quarantining at home.”

Congressman Chris Stewart: “The High Art of Using the Threat of Socialism to Achieve Political Aims.”

Senate President Stuart Adams and House Speaker Brad Wilson: Google search: “How to flex legislative branch muscle by calling a special session with a multitude of topics.”

Frank Pignanelli: “Alexa, how do I construct a face mask that allows me to drink wine?”

LaVarr Webb: “Another Top Benefit of Zoom: No One Can See the Chicken Poop on Your Farm Boots.”

Did first-ever virtual conventions change any minds?

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The 2020 national political conventions are over, both of them historic and unprecedented thanks to the coronavirus pandemic. We examine the impact of the Republican extravaganza last week on Utah and national politics.

Did the GOP convention give President Donald Trump a boost in the base and among the undecided in Utah? What were convention themes that will impact Utah political races this November?

Pignanelli: “To best describe the Republican convention, I quote the great earthy Hollywood star Mae West, who said “too much of a good thing … is wonderful.” You can’t watch for an hour without Donald Trump being on.” — Mark Shields, PBS

Both conventions prove that politics follow the laws of physics.

For example, an object will remain at rest unless changed by an external force. President Trump broke tradition by appearing all four days during the convention, serving notice he will be an aggressive force in campaigning. Democrat nominee Joseph Biden has no choice but to respond appropriately through more personal, less structured, interactions.

Second, force is equal to a change in momentum. Trump is attempting to alter Biden’s lead in the polls with unprecedented use of incumbent powers in a convention setting. In an amazing display, he pardoned the reformed convict, welcomed Americans held prisoner, congratulated new citizens, thanked first responders and received praise from beneficiaries of programs. These activities were counter propellants while energizing the base.

For every action in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. The Democrats produced a well-crafted convention promising a dystopian future if Trump is reelected. The GOP painted an equally disturbing nightmare if Biden succeeds. Democrats promoted diversity and Republicans responded. Indeed, the best speakers last week were people of color: Sen. Tim Scott, Ambassador Nikki Haley, Kentucky attorney general Daniel Cameron, etc.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed but transformed to another form. Passionate speeches replaced any discussion of policy.

Both campaigns will now attempt to defy gravity.

Webb: I thought the Republican convention was very effective and I expect it will give Trump a bump in Utah and nationally. The pageantry and stagecraft were superior to the Democratic convention, despite the Dems’ use of Hollywood celebrities. By contrast, the Republicans highlighted everyday heroes with compelling personal stories, and they were more convincing than the celebrities backing Joe Biden.

Republicans reached out far beyond their base with a remarkable diversity of speakers, most with positive, uplifting messages about the opportunity and greatness of America. The highlight was the many eloquent and persuasive Black Americans, all outspoken in their support for Trump.

In fact, many of the speakers were so good that Trump should switch places with Joe Biden and lock himself in the basement for the next two months. I’m only half-joking. Trump’s loyal supporters made a better case for Trump than he makes for himself. He should let these sensible, wholesome, uplifting regular citizens be the face of the campaign, not his ego and self-promotion.

If Trump could stop tweeting, stop going off on nonsensical tangents, and personally reflect the heartfelt goodness exhibited in the convention, he could actually win this thing.

The GOP opted out of a platform and instead passed a resolution stating, “The Republican Party has and will continue to enthusiastically support the president’s America-first agenda.” Is this the beginning of a trend?

Pignanelli: Since 1856, the GOP has articulated a platform of promises to voters. So, the 2020 truncated statement is fostering cynical allegations of a personality cult dominating the party. But honestly, who really reads platforms of political parties other than academics, ultra-activists and opponents looking for attack gems? National Democrats created an 80-page platform document never mentioned during prime time.

As political convocations evolve, detailed platforms of mainstream parties become extinct.

Webb: No one ever pays attention to platforms, so no big loss. But even without a GOP platform, the two conventions did present stark contrasts between the two parties and their candidates. Anyone who watched both conventions has a clear choice.

I believe both parties include very good, well-meaning people who want what’s best for America. But, having watched both conventions, a fundamental difference is that Democrats believe that government, with its inherent use of coercion and tax dollars, is best positioned to fix America’s problems. Republicans want a greater reliance on individual freedom, responsibility and the private sector. Both philosophies can be taken to dangerous extremes, of course, but the Republican philosophy of limited government, more freedom, low taxes and personal responsibility has greater appeal to me.

Do both events confirm that virtual conventions will become permanent features for national and state politics?

Pignanelli: Future business meetings, including political gatherings, will be a hybrid of personal and web-based participation. Trump’s demolishing of almost every sacred tradition (many of them silly) will ease the development of changes.

Webb: The virtual conventions grew on me as the days went by. The wide variety of activities in symbolic locations (Republicans did it especially well) created faster-moving and more interesting conventions than watching speaker after speaker at the same podium before the same crowd, with numerous applause lines that slow down a speech.

Considering how quickly both parties had to change plans and go virtual, the conventions were remarkably entertaining, substantive and effective.

Hoopla-less conventions probably won’t change many minds

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The national political party conventions are mostly virtual this year, minus all the hoopla and excitement of a traditional convention. This raises a variety of questions.

The Democratic convention concluded on Thursday. Did Utahns and other Americans pay attention to the mostly recorded speeches, and will the convention give Joe Biden a boost? Is the virtual convention a permanent feature for national and state politics?

Pignanelli: “The Democrat keynote addresses … touched all the erogenous zones of the body politic.” – Mark Shields, PBS

Political conventions are like snow cones in the summer: sweet to some, too sugary and unappealing to others, melting fast then soon forgotten. This season, the audience is much lower than four years ago, which is significant because viewership has been dropping for decades.

Some programming, such as the showcasing of rising stars, was mediocre. Strong performances included Jill Biden, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, and famous Republicans crossing lines (i.e. John Kasich, Colin Powell). The introduction to Vice Presidential nominee Kamala Harris was compelling. Few details regarding programs of a potential Biden Administration were provided. The substance and emotion were focused on critiquing and ousting the incumbent.

Politicos doubted a convention activity could appeal without thousands of delegates cheering and demonstrating momentum. But the country has grown accustomed to web-based pre-prepared presentations. Instead of speaking to a packed gallery using teleprompters and delivering applause lines, many presenters delivered a more personal connection to viewers. Further, the event obliterated future needs for real-time roll calls and live keynote speakers.

Virtual conventions can efficiently project a party’s candidates and messaging. Plus, they are less messy than a traditional snow cone.

Webb: It’s still amazing to me how we ended up with two old duffers as presidential candidates instead of giving a new generation a chance. (I’m old, but people older than me are also duffers.) I slogged through much of the Democratic convention and mostly learned that the Democrats are trying their best to get me to vote for Donald Trump even though I greatly dislike much about him.

The convention was glitzy with a lot of inspirational talk, but policywise it was the same old liberal dogma of identity politics, bigger government programs, higher taxes and more regulation. The only speakers who focused on policy were leftists like Bernie Sanders who promoted ultra-liberal wish lists and promised Biden would deliver government-mandated utopia.

The Democrats expect to win simply by being anti-Trump, not by selling a sensible policy agenda. With their emphasis on victimhood, “structural racism” and supporting protests that turned into violent riots, I doubt they convinced many middle America voters to support Biden.

What are the themes that emerged from the convention, and what will be the impact on Utah political races this November?

Pignanelli: Utahns understand Biden is a decent family person, possessing deep caring for the common people. These themes were consistently highlighted during the convention. Attention to Biden’s exemplary character is needed to help deflect expected attacks on the progressive elements of his platform.

Niceness is rarely a quality needed for presidential aspirations, but this year such a characteristic could be important for some Utahns.

Webb: All the Democratic presidential candidates, including Biden, tilted far left during the primary to try to win the liberal Democratic base. I heard nothing policywise in the convention to bring the party back to the middle. While there was lip service to love of country, there were also nods to the radical groups that want to fundamentally uproot traditional American culture.

Even though Biden is an honorable person, his party is more far left than I’ve seen in my lifetime. The Democratic makeover of America will mean abortion up to the moment of birth (with federal funding), onerous climate change measures, attacks on religious freedom, weak foreign policy, higher taxes, bigger government with ever-ballooning debt, and a liberal judiciary that ignores constitutional originalism.

So what’s more dangerous — Trump’s egomania, or a leftist conquest of the country?

The Republican convention opens this week. As with the Democrats, will the GOP scare or bore the audience?

Pignanelli: No convention is complete without demonizing opponents through frightening the audience with threats of a dystopian future if the other side prevails. Threats of unconstitutional tyranny and societal disintegration were repeated all last week. Rioting in the streets, unchecked violence and big brother government are likely scenarios to be described by the GOP messaging if they are not returned to power. But a more productive, although boring, necessity is a listing of achievements that are often lost in the din of the media and tweets from you know who. That will be the true challenge for Republicans.

Webb: I don’t think either convention will change many minds. Trump needs to lay out a positive agenda for a second term and then be far more disciplined in his messaging instead of going off on weird tangents several times a day.

I don’t like the highly-flawed Trump, but I can’t abide the thought of turning the entire federal government over to Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

Kamala Harris completes Biden’s ticket. Next up: conventions

This year did not disappoint, but this election season has been like no other. We explore the impacts on our lovely state.

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

For many decades, summers leading to national party conventions have provided entertainment, intrigue, posturing and strategy. This year did not disappoint, but this election season has been like no other. We explore the impacts on our lovely state.

Vice President Mike Pence and California Sen. Kamala Harris will be squaring off in the only vice presidential debate at the University of Utah on Oct. 7. What will be the implications on local politics of Joe Biden’s selection of Harris as his running mate?

Pignanelli: “Black women have long stood as the bridge between despair and relief for American democracy and long impacted the landscape of politics for centuries. … Black women bring a radical reimagination and envisioning of America.” — Jamar A. Boyd II

In fall 2008, the country was confronting the Great Recession. Democrats nominated an African American as a presidential nominee, and Republicans offered a woman as a vice presidential contender. This unprecedented diversity at the highest levels reminded Americans, in a difficult time, of our country’s greatness.

Supporting or disagreeing with Harris’ past and current policies is an appropriate — and necessary — exercise of democracy. But especially in this present turmoil, the importance of her on the ballot must not be dismissed. Harris was selected for her characteristics, prompting a long-overdue recognition of the contributions made by Black and Indian Americans.

Harris is unlikely to alter the outcome of Utahns’ preference for president in November. But she will make a difference. As with the candidacies of Barack Obama and Sarah Palin 12 years ago, Utahns should find comfort that our nation is a vibrant beacon of confidence. Hopefully, this increases voter participation and civic engagement.

Webb: I’m not a fan of Kamala Harris as she’s far too liberal for me. But I congratulate her and Joe Biden on the historic nature of her selection. That’s worth celebrating.

Unfortunately, her selection was somewhat diminished by Biden’s announcement that he would only consider women as his running mate, thereby excluding half the population solely because of their gender. That is blatant gender discrimination — affirmative action in vice presidential selections.

It would have been much better had Biden selected Harris based on her qualifications, because she was simply the best choice. Certainly, a prospective vice president’s gender can be one factor in a selection. Deciding that a woman balances the ticket is a legitimate strategy. But announcing in advance that all men were excluded from consideration because they are men was a great example of sexism.

It’s important to remember that if Biden wins, Harris will likely be the Democratic presidential nominee 2024. A President Harris is not a comforting thought. I disagree with her on many issues, especially her position on abortion, taxes and her savaging of conservative judicial nominees.

For more than a century, the Republican and Democrat national conventions were huge events that attracted global attention. This year they will be minor electronic activities with little or no live audiences. Is this just an outlier because of the pandemic or a trend of the future?

Pignanelli: A weird political nerd, I watched every national convention of both parties since 1976. Over time, they have become increasingly irrelevant to millions of television viewers. Networks decreased coverage as a result. The pandemic illuminated that society disregards this once important activity. (Utah party delegates voted at unprecedented levels this year, demonstrating a preference for an electronic format over a convention.)

Humans (especially the political subspecies) love social events. So, there will always be organizing and promotional political events to keep activists engaged. But the big national conventions are now a relic.

Webb: The conventions will produce no drama or surprises. But I hope more than just political junkies will pay attention. Listening to the speeches will reveal a lot about the two political parties and their presidential tickets — their ideologies, positions on issues, how far left or right they are, etc.

My guess is both parties will try to keep speakers in the mainstream, hiding their most extreme positions. But watch the speeches and then ask yourself, “Which party, candidates and positions best represent my personal political views?”

Utah’s congressional delegation is split in the level of support for the executive orders issued by President Donald Trump as a backup to congressional failure to extend benefits. Could this become an election issue?

Pignanelli: Candidates not supportive of executive orders will be accused of insensitivity to struggling Americans. Yet, those who do support them will receive similar condemnations. Thus, a campaign issue is born. Unfortunately, this masks Congress again surrendering a fundamental legislative power to the executive branch.

Webb: It was a bit of a surprise that Mitt Romney didn’t lambaste the president for signing executive orders to provide further pandemic relief. I suppose it was an acknowledgement that Congress is paralyzed and unable to get anything done, so the president is filling the vacuum. Democrats have been quick to blast Trump’s executive orders, but Obama did the very same thing multiple times when he couldn’t get Congress to act as he desired.

It’s the dog days of summer, and these political topics are just as hot

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

We are officially suffering through the dog days of summer. The warmer weather and even hotter political confrontations could impact elections less than 90 days away. Hopefully, our nifty analysis will bring cool relief.

Political observers were surprised that a Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics poll showed a tie between Democratic Rep. Ben McAdams and Republican challenger Burgess Owens (35% each, 24% undecided) in the 4th District. Is this result signifying a Republican trend?

Pignanelli: “The coronavirus could not have emerged at a worse time … amid a heated presidential election built upon months of vitriol, accusations, and competitiveness —Eduardo J. Gómez and Sandro Galea, professors of public health

Disease alters politics. This lesson from the 1918 pandemic is instructive again in 2020. Then, the party controlling Congress (Democrats) suffered a beating in the wartime midterm elections and the GOP assumed control of both houses, which had not occurred since 1908. Similar elements are in play 102 years later. This summer, numerous incumbents faced fierce internal party challenges — some did not prevail.

There is intense unease as Americans endure economic uncertainty, massive protests and a relentless virus. So, as Congress continues to fruitlessly dally on economic assistance packages, voters’ angst is reflected towards pollsters and in the polls.

This is likely happening in the 4th Congressional District. The fact McAdams won by a slim margin against a tough incumbent does not explain the current status of the race. McAdams garners high approval ratings and is aggressive in demanding government integrity. He should be in a stronger position against an unknown challenger.

Other unpublicized research is revealing similar results. So, both national parties will dump resources into the race. McAdams needs to demonstrate he abhors the ridiculous wrangling happening in Washington DC. Burgess, possessing a great personal story, must make it relatable to today’s events.

Since the federal government is split, candidates in both parties should heed the lessons of 1918.

Webb: These survey results are surprising because Burgess isn’t well known and tends to be a bit too far right for the 4th District. McAdams is well-liked and his Democratic Party affiliation hasn’t seemed to bother voters in the past. So it’s possible that this survey is an outlier. Additional polling is needed to confirm the status of this race.

It’s also possible that voters are “nationalizing” this race as Republicans hope they will. I believe a majority of Utah voters aren’t excited about Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer taking over the Congress and taking it far to the left. The result will be even bigger government and higher taxes. That’s a strong argument against sending a Democrat (McAdams) to Congress to help ensure a Democratic majority.

However, most Utah voters don’t nationalize these contests. They vote for the local candidate they like most and don’t worry about the national ramifications. Further survey research is needed to get a real handle on this race.

The protests in the streets have transformed into intense arguments over schools. The Hinckley Institute/Deseret News Poll indicates 48% of Utahns want schools open while 31% demand closure. Will the fight over real or virtual classrooms impact elections?

Pignanelli: This is a true no-win scenario. If there are outbreaks after schools are open —over the objections of teachers — many officials will face intense scrutiny. But if schools are closed, and students remain healthy (which we hope), then haggled parents may seek vengeance in November for over-caution. Candidates must be careful and strive to demonstrate sensitivity to all concerns. Blustery one-sided statements could be fatal.

Webb: I strongly believe the default position should be that schools open and students get back in class. There are variations and combinations, of course, and parents should have flexibility to send their children to school or use remote learning or home-schooling.

I personally believe the damage caused by keeping students home is greater than the risk of opening schools. Keeping schools closed is an education concern, an economic concern and a mental health concern, as well as a health issue.

There will still be a substantial amount of online learning, and perhaps teachers who are at health risk, or who don’t want to return to the classroom, can handle those duties. However, at some point some teachers may have to make a choice to stay in the profession or not. A national publication recently published an article by an ICU nurse who said she’s been on the job every day at great risk to herself and her family — and teachers should feel the same obligation.

In Utah, coronavirus case counts are dropping but deaths are increasing. Where does this push political activism?

Pignanelli: During the 1918 pandemic, Americans who protested mandates while doubting the need for the protective garment, established “Anti-mask Leagues.” Because overall numbers are dropping and fatalities are overwhelmingly relegated to an older and compromised population, similar organizations may pop up this year.

Webb: We need to realize that we all are going to have to settle in for the long haul to combat COVID-19, while saving the economy. It’s not going to be over in a few months. The more we’re willing to cooperate, compromise a bit and follow good health protocols, the better off we’ll all be.

Is Utah in play for Biden’s presidential bid?

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

A recent UtahPolicy.com survey revealed President Donald Trump was only three points ahead of Democratic nominee Joe Biden (44% to 41%) among Utah voters. Considering that the last time the state voted for a Democratic presidential candidate was 1964, these numbers created a stir among local and national politicos. We explore the ramifications.

What is happening in such a red state? Does Biden have a shot of winning Utah’s electoral votes or will Trump’s tiny lead expand before the election?

Pignanelli: “The president must change both substantively and stylistically, his approach to the American people. If he does that … there’s plenty of time for him to come back and make this a race he can win.”— Chris Christie A long-held axiom of the human condition is an individual’s greatest strengths can, under stressful situations, be lethal shortcomings. The pandemic is creating such challenging affections for politicians.

Trump was elected and revered by many, because of his brazen willingness to disrupt the status quo. But more radical changes to society are caused by a raging pandemic. All Americans were harmed to some degree by the virus. So, many no longer value or desire disruption instigated by leaders. Trump is having difficulty pivoting to a different role — as reflected in national and state polls. Biden on the other hand turned the usual criticism of him as an aging Washington, D.C., insider into a source of comfort for Americans.

Utahns appreciate Biden’s grandfatherly approach and sense of compassion. But Utah is a red state, and many will be receptive to the attacks on Biden by Trump (i.e. too close to Bernie Sanders, weak on riots, etc.). If Biden is still very close in mid-October, then there are much greater forces in play on a national level.

“The Great Disruptor” was usurped by a microscopic foe and must find a new persona to survive.

Webb: I concur with the conventional wisdom that voters tend to come home to their parties as election day nears, although nothing is normal with Trump. But I believe Trump will enjoy a fairly comfortable win over Biden in Utah, even though a lot of voters will hold their noses.

Most mainstream Republicans (like me) don’t really like Trump personally. We clearly see his deep and multiple character flaws. But, in the big, bad real world out there, we’ll vote for Trump because we don’t want to turn the nation over to Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That lurch to the far left is even scarier than four more years of Trump and his gigantic ego, incessant and juvenile tweeting and his bullying and personal attacks.

In addition, most smart Utah Republicans want to see an ideologically conservative U.S. Supreme Court. Another Trump term would almost certainly deliver it, along with many more conservative judges on lower courts. Trump’s judicial impact could be his presidency’s most important and lasting legacy and is critically important to the nation’s future.

Finally, most smart Utah Republicans agree with many of Trump’s overarching policies (with the exception of immigration), even though the execution has been erratic.

If Trump loses nationally, and there’s a good chance he will, it won’t be because of his big policy initiatives like cutting taxes and regulations and a more muscular foreign policy. It will be because of his personal character flaws.

When the history of Trump’s presidency is written, it may be a story of wasted potential, of opportunity lost, because of the president’s unpresidential behavior on silly, inconsequential things.

What impact will the presidential race have on Utah elections, especially in the 4th District?

Pignanelli: Unless there is another catastrophe (please, no!), neither presidential candidate will provide coattails for local candidates. Indeed, the opposite may occur. Trump is not popular in the 4th Congressional District, providing Ben McAdams an unexpected advantage.

Further, because both national nominees are a mixed bag, congressional and state candidates must fashion their responses to the pandemic and visions for the future. Thus, no free rides for anybody.

Webb: The presidential ticket probably influences local elections by only a few points. But a few percentage points may make all the difference in the 4th District. Given his money and name ID, incumbent Democrat McAdams remains the favorite to win.

Because of the unexpected close race between Trump and Biden, will Utah be considered a battleground state and receive attention from the presidential campaigns?

Pignanelli: Evan McMullin pulled enough votes to make the 2016 race in Utah a much closer contest between Hillary Clinton and Trump, resulting in interest from both campaigns. If Biden continues to fare well in the larger battleground states, he may run up the score by appealing to potential swing voters in red states like Utah.

Webb: Biden has been hiding in his basement, hoping Trump will implode (pretty good strategy). But in this weird, pandemic-abbreviated presidential race, both candidates will have higher priorities than Utah to focus on in the last months of the contest.

What would the original Pioneer Day look like with Twitter and Zoom?

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

This weekend we celebrate a very unique Pioneer Day. Re-warming an insightful, serious intellectual exercise we perform every few years, we contemplate what Brother Brigham’s entry into the valley might have been like, along with comments from other political personalities, using Zoom, tweets and facing a modern pandemic.

by@prophet.org: Just emerged from the mountains. What beauty and what potential. It was a long trek to social distance away from Nauvoo but, unless the jackrabbits are infected, we are safe from the global scourge.

by@prophet.org: You’re invited to a Zoom meeting to get organized. Please wear Sunday best for the cameras. No overalls, Levis or pantaloons. No backdrops of Hawaiian beaches.

by@prophet.org: I call many of you to settle small towns and cities across the state, each 10 miles apart — perfect for social distancing.

by@ldsprophet.com: Please wear your masks at our Saturday evening square dances, but avoid looking like stagecoach robbers or you might be shot.

Spencercox.lg@wokerepublican.com: Important agenda item for Zoom meeting: Naming everything “Deseret” since that name has no baggage and no one will want to change it 170 years from now.

gary.herbert@mostpopulargovinamerica.com: I can help organize this wilderness. I see WalletHub recognizing us as best-managed territory.

utahcountyactivists@nevertooextreme.com: No offense brothers and sisters, but we wish to establish a separate colony 45 miles south of that big salty lake. Here we could create a paradise with no threat of independent thought, diversity or face masks.

utahtechies@wecandoanything.net: Do not worry about anything. We technology companies just arrived, and can apply our skills to solve any problem ... including quick, reliable testing for global scourges.

jennywilson@slcomayor.org: In our enlightened SLCO, we mandate masks (even for Zoom meetings) and sheltering at home (except for protests). I promise to fill the scriptural need for “opposition in all things.” You are welcome.

erinmendenhall@thatotheroutspokenmayor.com: We will establish a capital city as a safe place for protesters, bicyclists, vegans, tree-huggers and any other “woke” causes

.derekmiller@bizguy.com: I envision a great opportunity for businesses to move lengthy wagon trains of goods through a land port near that salty lake. Certainly, there could be no opposition to such a great idea.

mlmmarketers@utoocanberich.com: Eating lean buffalo meat and walking 20 miles a day kept us healthy crossing the plains. But now we need nutritional supplements! And a superior economic model! Given our camaraderie, we can each sell to 10 friends, who can sell to their 10 friends, who can sell to their 10, and so on. Prosperity abounds! (If you get in early!)

dc@utahcoveniencestores.com After a hard day making the desert blossom as a rose, everyone will need cool refreshment. We sense a business opportunity with a 64-ounce dark, carbonated bubbly liquid — low in calorie but very addictive.

seanreyes@agforce.net: I will protect our people against the evils of the federal government ... while they receive PPP loans.

chrispeterson@longshot.com: Let us make permanent the pioneer custom of splitting wards along party lines. I’d have a fighting chance to become governor

!gregskordas@goodlookingandexperienced.com: Justice is blind, and so should be politics. In this new territory voters should be blindfolded so they can’t see who they’re voting for.

mittromney@lovetopoketrump.org: I am truly blessed to immigrate to this mountain paradise by private jet after serving the lobster state of Massachusetts. While I was unsuccessful seeking our nation’s presidency, I appreciate the voters of this pioneer state giving me the opportunity to publicly antagonize the current White House resident.

mike.lee@wannabeasupreme.com: I will stand guard night and day against attempts by the feds to spy on us. Continually rereading the more exciting passages of the Constitution will keep me alert for this important duty.

snooty@whycantutahbelikecalifornia.com: The really cool, smart and rich will settle in Park City, where we will one day view independent cinema and slide down snowy hills on skinny boards.

Stuart.adams@senprez.com: I envision a group of leaders, called senators, providing a public refuge of wisdom, peace and tranquility to counter the impulsiveness of the lower body.

Brad.Wilson@housechief.com: I envision a group of leaders, called representatives, providing energy and entertainment, and a place where Senate bills come to die.

benmcadams@reallyhatesnukes.com: This is a place we can come together and stop nuclear weapons testing in the nearby foreign land of Nevada and provide a safe, popular issue as I seek reelection.

burgessowens@superbowlchamp.com: I know I was brought here to put my conservative skills to use, honed on Fox News, to defeat all those liberals and socialists who are undermining the nation.

johncurtis@lovetobequirky.org: This is the place where a moderate mayor in a conservative county can be elected to Congress and can social distance by riding into the sunset atop a two-wheeled motorized contraption.

Chrisstewart@jetguy.com: Such a bountiful place where I can write books, fly planes, hang with the nation’s spymasters and still get great fry sauce.

robbishop@baseballnut.com: This desert has blossomed nicely with Diet Dr. Pepper, Triple-A baseball and very few Democrats. Truly a promised land!

Obnoxious.pointless@deseretnews.com: Yes, that’s Frank and LaVarr. We’re just happy to so far avoid tar and feathers in this great place!

School reopening and pandemic politics: Will voluntary mask up efforts succeed, or is a mandate necessary?

By Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to generate emotion, multiple perceptions of reality, and episodes of irresponsibility, courage and resilience. Such dynamics guarantee that politics is afoot. We ruminate on contested issues impacting the political landscape — and our health.

A major source of pandemic contention in the nation and state is whether government should mandate mask wearing while in public. Meanwhile, private institutions are encouraging voluntary compliance — as they should. For example, Deseret News Opinion Editor Boyd Matheson recently called for a 55-day mask-up crusade to scale back the virus by Labor Day. Inquiries from national organizations have been received over this intense volunteer effort. Should state government mandate mask wearing, or will voluntary appeals succeed?

Pignanelli: “Wear a mask, unless you want to be intubated by a gynecology intern who did her last semester of med school via Zoom.” — Dr. Emily Porter, emergency physician

State leaders missed an opportunity. They should have appointed the individual with Jedi master skills who could compel citizens to wear a mask by utilizing the greatest force in the universe — guilt. I am referring to my Irish Catholic mother. Her Yoda abilities of imposing self-reproach would soon have all Utahns wearing masks with deep contrition for past omissions.

The emotions fostered by masks are pulling officials in opposite directions. Even the compromise crafted by Gov. Gary Herbert of requiring masks just for public schools is generating vocal opposition from many parents. Lawmakers are raising legitimate questions how to enforce a comprehensive mask mandate without looking like a police state.

Even dedicated advocates of opening the economy in a green phase (including me) understand unequivocally that wearing a mask is the most efficient activity to contain the virus. This is driving alternate voices including Matheson’s call to arms and the compelling campaign “stay safe to stay open” launched by the business community.

These “Utah Way” voluntary efforts must succeed, or a mandate is in the future. (Of course, Mom is always available.)

Webb: Opinions are firm and emotions are high on mandatory masks. It’s always better to willingly do what’s right, rather than be forced by the heavy hand of government. Mask-wearing enforcement is tough, but we could publish names and images of violators on Frank’s Facebook account, a virtual wall of shame. Cameras are everywhere, so beware. Personally, my wife says I look a lot better when most of my face is covered, so I have no problem donning a mask.

While local governments should be able to impose mask sanctions if they wish, a statewide mandate is not necessary. The state is too diverse and conditions vary too much for statewide compulsion. For example, my wife and I have been social distancing at our farm in the remote northwestern corner of Box Elder County. The nearest humans are a mile away, so no need to wear a mask. However, I find I don’t scare the cows, chickens, dogs and coyotes as much when I cover up my ugly mug.

The federal and the Utah governments are under scrutiny in the media and by political opponents on managing the COVID-19 crisis. Did our leaders act appropriately and where is public opinion going on this?

Pignanelli: Other countries have succeeded in persuading their populations to comply with restrictions. But Americans are not Danish or New Zealanders. We have a rough independent streak, creating issues for government leaders. Remember, our immediate ancestors were similarly obnoxious and stubborn — while defeating fascism, communism and other challenges.

Americans do demand competence with basic functions in the public and private sectors. So, their litmus tests for government will be consistent reliable testing and a strategic approach to vaccinations.

Webb: Liberals and the media have been critical because the Trump administration and governors have not issued harsh nationwide and statewide stay-at-home and mask-wearing mandates. Sure, such edicts might have reduced the virus spread. But Americans simply won’t stand for dramatic constraints on their freedom, even for health reasons. Americans are more independent and leery of government decrees than denizens of many other countries. Also, our system of federalism, a fragmented governance structure with sovereign states, doesn’t lend itself to dictates from on high. We can strike the right balance without onerous compulsion.

Leaders are doing their best with the information at hand. No one can be fully prepared for something like this. Criticism is easy, especially in hindsight, and especially from those hanging out on the sidelines who don’t have to make the quick and tough decisions.

Utah school districts are developing a variety of approaches to opening schools this fall with online and/or classroom participation. Should kids go back to school?

Pignanelli: Elementary school children suffer milder ramifications of the virus. School programs provide incredible needed services (i.e. nutrition, preventing abuse, expanding learning, de facto childcare for working families). The schools must fully reopen.

Webb: Local districts properly have the authority to make reopening decisions based on local conditions. Parents should be able to determine whether children go to school or learn online. But, in general, I believe we should absolutely get the kids back in class, taking all feasible steps to keep them safe.